[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       llvm-commits
Subject:    [PATCH] D30444: Rename isKnownNotFullPoison to programUndefinedIfPoison; NFC
From:       Sanjoy Das via Phabricator via llvm-commits <llvm-commits () lists ! llvm ! org>
Date:       2017-04-30 19:54:25
Message-ID: c24bb04530af21ded163ec6e12d19357 () localhost ! localdomain
[Download RAW message or body]

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL301776: Rename isKnownNotFullPoison to programUndefinedIfPoison; \
NFC (authored by sanjoy).

Changed prior to commit:
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D30444?vs=89977&id=97240#toc

Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D30444

Files:
  llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h
  llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
  llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
  llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP.cpp
  llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/flags-from-poison.ll


Index: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@
   ///
   /// Note that this currently only considers the basic block that is
   /// the parent of I.
-  bool isKnownNotFullPoison(const Instruction *PoisonI);
+  bool programUndefinedIfFullPoison(const Instruction *PoisonI);
 
   /// \brief Specific patterns of select instructions we can match.
   enum SelectPatternFlavor {
Index: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/flags-from-poison.ll
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/flags-from-poison.ll
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/flags-from-poison.ll
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
   ret void
 }
 
-; Demonstrate why we need a Visited set in llvm::isKnownNotFullPoison.
+; Demonstrate why we need a Visited set in llvm::programUndefinedIfFullPoison.
 define void @test-add-not-header5(float* %input, i32 %offset) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-not-header5
 entry:
Index: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP.cpp
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP.cpp
@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@
   // Add I to DominatingExprs if it's an add/sub that can't sign overflow.
   if (match(I, m_NSWAdd(m_Value(LHS), m_Value(RHS))) ||
       match(I, m_NSWSub(m_Value(LHS), m_Value(RHS)))) {
-    if (isKnownNotFullPoison(I)) {
+    if (programUndefinedIfFullPoison(I)) {
       const SCEV *Key =
           SE->getAddExpr(SE->getUnknown(LHS), SE->getUnknown(RHS));
       DominatingExprs[Key].push_back(I);
Index: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
@@ -3841,7 +3841,7 @@
   }
 }
 
-bool llvm::isKnownNotFullPoison(const Instruction *PoisonI) {
+bool llvm::programUndefinedIfFullPoison(const Instruction *PoisonI) {
   // We currently only look for uses of poison values within the same basic
   // block, as that makes it easier to guarantee that the uses will be
   // executed given that PoisonI is executed.
Index: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -5029,7 +5029,8 @@
     return false;
 
   // Only proceed if we can prove that I does not yield poison.
-  if (!isKnownNotFullPoison(I)) return false;
+  if (!programUndefinedIfFullPoison(I))
+    return false;
 
   // At this point we know that if I is executed, then it does not wrap
   // according to at least one of NSW or NUW. If I is not executed, then we do


["D30444.97240.patch" (text/x-patch)]

Index: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@
   ///
   /// Note that this currently only considers the basic block that is
   /// the parent of I.
-  bool isKnownNotFullPoison(const Instruction *PoisonI);
+  bool programUndefinedIfFullPoison(const Instruction *PoisonI);
 
   /// \brief Specific patterns of select instructions we can match.
   enum SelectPatternFlavor {
Index: llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/flags-from-poison.ll
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/flags-from-poison.ll
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/flags-from-poison.ll
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
   ret void
 }
 
-; Demonstrate why we need a Visited set in llvm::isKnownNotFullPoison.
+; Demonstrate why we need a Visited set in llvm::programUndefinedIfFullPoison.
 define void @test-add-not-header5(float* %input, i32 %offset) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-not-header5
 entry:
Index: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP.cpp
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP.cpp
@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@
   // Add I to DominatingExprs if it's an add/sub that can't sign overflow.
   if (match(I, m_NSWAdd(m_Value(LHS), m_Value(RHS))) ||
       match(I, m_NSWSub(m_Value(LHS), m_Value(RHS)))) {
-    if (isKnownNotFullPoison(I)) {
+    if (programUndefinedIfFullPoison(I)) {
       const SCEV *Key =
           SE->getAddExpr(SE->getUnknown(LHS), SE->getUnknown(RHS));
       DominatingExprs[Key].push_back(I);
Index: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
@@ -3841,7 +3841,7 @@
   }
 }
 
-bool llvm::isKnownNotFullPoison(const Instruction *PoisonI) {
+bool llvm::programUndefinedIfFullPoison(const Instruction *PoisonI) {
   // We currently only look for uses of poison values within the same basic
   // block, as that makes it easier to guarantee that the uses will be
   // executed given that PoisonI is executed.
Index: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -5029,7 +5029,8 @@
     return false;
 
   // Only proceed if we can prove that I does not yield poison.
-  if (!isKnownNotFullPoison(I)) return false;
+  if (!programUndefinedIfFullPoison(I))
+    return false;
 
   // At this point we know that if I is executed, then it does not wrap
   // according to at least one of NSW or NUW. If I is not executed, then we do

[Attachment #4 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic