[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       llvm-commits
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix rtti flags with cmake
From:       Johannes Obermayr <johannesobermayr () gmx ! de>
Date:       2014-10-27 20:57:50
Message-ID: 1464190.xGEZig7lgY () vadda
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Montag, 27. Oktober 2014, 16:41:56 schrieb Jan Vesely:
> On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 08:56 +0900, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote:
> > Sorry for the delay.
> > 
> > I think llvm_update_compile_flags() (in AddLLVM.cmake) could manage it.
> > I will work for it, please be patient.
> 
> ping
> 
> any progress? this patch is still needed. is there any reason not to
> merge it it the meantime, while a better solution is prepared?
> 
> is there anything I can do to help speed this up?

Ten months later we are back at \
http://marc.info/?l=llvm-commits&m=139111234208111&w=2 : "Sadly I doubt because \
attitude of LLVM/Clang maintainers regarding pushing/committing all of my build fixes \
for openSUSE I sent to their mailing lists shows that there isn't any "real" interest \
in having things upstream fixed for this free-and-open-source-non-Apple-product named \
Linux ..."

If LLVM/Clang maintainers was really interested in a working CMake build system (for \
Linux) they would have pushed my patches ...

---
Johannes

> 
> thanks,
> jan
> 
> > 
> > 2014-01-31 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@google.com>:
> > > Thanks for the pings Rafael...
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Rafael Espíndola
> > > <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On 30 January 2014 14:38, Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu> wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 17:03 -0800, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
> > > > > > ccing the code owner.
> > > > > 
> > > > > is there anything I can do to help this get merged?
> > > > 
> > > > Takumi, you just did some work on RTTI with cmake. Any thoughts on this
> > > > patch?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I've looked at the patch and I think its probably fine, but I think Takumi
> > > should sign off on it / merge it. Mostly because of his recent work on the
> > > flag management -- I want to make sure it works well with the new management
> > > that is going in which looks really good.
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]