[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       llvm-commits
Subject:    Re: [llvm-commits] [llvm] r94937 - in /llvm/trunk:
From:       Evan Cheng <evan.cheng () apple ! com>
Date:       2010-01-31 19:37:03
Message-ID: EE729BF0-8AB6-4B3A-B5F6-87BA29A41732 () apple ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

No. But it doesn't make sense to tail call no return calls as far as I can tell.

Evan

On Jan 31, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:

> Hi Evan,
> 
> > Do not mark no-return calls tail calls. It'll screw up special calls like longjmp \
> > and it doesn't make much sense for performance reason. If my logic is faulty, \
> > please let me know.
> 
> can you rely on the special calls always being marked noreturn?
> 
> Ciao,
> 
> Duncan.


_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]