[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       llvm-bugs
Subject:    [llvm-bugs] [Bug 61857] Clang doesn't fully implement [temp.func.order]/6
From:       LLVM Bugs via llvm-bugs <llvm-bugs () lists ! llvm ! org>
Date:       2023-03-31 0:49:08
Message-ID: 20230331004908.e6301cad629f936c () email ! llvm ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (text/html)]

<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
    <tr>
        <th>Issue</th>
        <td>
            <a href=https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61857>61857</a>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <th>Summary</th>
        <td>
            Clang doesn&apos;t fully implement [temp.func.order]/6
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <th>Labels</th>
      <td>
            c++20,
            clang:frontend,
            rejects-valid,
            concepts
      </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <th>Assignees</th>
      <td>
      </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <th>Reporter</th>
      <td>
          cjdb
      </td>
    </tr>
</table>

<pre>
    It looks like neither GCC nor Clang can compile \
[[temp.func.order]/example-6](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.func.order#example-6) (see \
[Compiler Explorer](https://godbolt.org/z/rhaK3cdba)).

It might be a defect in the example (perhaps it meant to say &quot;error&quot; \
instead of &quot;OK&quot;), but my reading of the paragraph suggests that \
[p6.4](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.func.order#6.4) should apply in the failing case. \
Alternatively, this is a spaceship issue, rather than a \
[P2113](http://wg21.link/P2113) one. </pre>
<img width="1px" height="1px" alt="" \
src="http://email.email.llvm.org/o/eJykk8GOrTYMhp8mbKxBYA4cWLCYOVOqq7toXyEkBnInJFFipvf \
06asw03ukUXfdgGJH_j_Hv2VKZnVEo2hfRPtayIM3H0f1Q8_F7PV9_MZgvX9LYM0bgSPDG0X4_XYD5yPcrHQrK \
OlA-T0YS3DWeWHaQ7kcTpU-aoqifRU40U-5B0tP3XnsN-aQRPMscMpJsqVJAicl8EXgi45yYYHT10rYPMrgAAL \
7RKfq7QMgwm8_g_XxU_SLyur17C2XPq4Cp78FTnGT3xulZylwEDiUonoV1fPH9xvDbtaNYSaQoGkhxWAc8EbwS \
ZEBAsVNhgSGYSfpGNhDkncQiBSjjwIRjEtMUoNfcviP7wLxFLzBfDDsd4gktXFrvpDLBxnlGmXYIB3rSokT8CY \
5Nxq68vL_XjAXwAHS5g-rQYZg7_-2tUhjzTnSRCU8W6boJJt3svcMy5tJYBJISEEqSpsJYFI6KCejPL3Bm3QgM \
-mfWNfNA_UX6V8r1qU17k3g9HEHB_COykKPjR6aQRY01l1fITbXS19s43K9drJVqlZD01-watthrmrd9qSxpfp \
amBErbKqmqavqMlR9SV1T1UrqDodlaDolLhXt0tjS2vc9z784uceu7ttrYeVMNp1LgPj5flidQ7rlSLa5aJ6X6 \
B2T078SkX6Q4vT0Lq15RJV3igKnHGhfizhmzaf5WJO4VNYkTg8KNmxp_Ngj7Sk5gVeG5bB5JtlhO7lz7P-5Ul1xRDt-8bjh7ZhL5XeBU9b5_D2F6DOtwOlsPVvl7P6fAAAA__9fUkM8">



[Attachment #3 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]