[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: llvm-bugs
Subject: [llvm-bugs] [Bug 50946] New: format-pedantic warns about passing nullptr to %p
From: via llvm-bugs <llvm-bugs () lists ! llvm ! org>
Date: 2021-06-30 17:00:00
Message-ID: bug-50946-206 () http ! bugs ! llvm ! org/
[Download RAW message or body]
--1625072400.43e6eee3.8295
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:00:00 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.llvm.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50946
Bug ID: 50946
Summary: format-pedantic warns about passing nullptr to %p
Product: clang
Version: 12.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
Reporter: eyalroz1@gmx.com
CC: blitzrakete@gmail.com, dgregor@apple.com,
erik.pilkington@gmail.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org,
richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk
Godbolt: https://godbolt.org/z/1dMKE1W81
If we compile:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
printf("%p\n", nullptr);
}
with clang++ -Wformat -pedantic, we get:
<source>:5:20: warning: format specifies type 'void *' but the argument has
type 'nullptr_t' [-Wformat-pedantic]
printf("%p\n", nullptr);
~~ ^~~~~~~
I believe that's _too_ pedantic. It is well and proper to pass nullptr to a %p
without casting it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--1625072400.43e6eee3.8295
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:00:00 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.llvm.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - format-pedantic warns about passing nullptr to %p"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50946">50946</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>format-pedantic warns about passing nullptr to %p
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>clang
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>12.0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>All
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>All
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>normal
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>P
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>C++
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>eyalroz1@gmx.com
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CC</th>
<td>blitzrakete@gmail.com, dgregor@apple.com, \
erik.pilkington@gmail.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, \
richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk </td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre>Godbolt: <a \
href="https://godbolt.org/z/1dMKE1W81">https://godbolt.org/z/1dMKE1W81</a>
If we compile:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
printf("%p\n", nullptr);
}
with clang++ -Wformat -pedantic, we get:
<source>:5:20: warning: format specifies type 'void *' but the argument has
type 'nullptr_t' [-Wformat-pedantic]
printf("%p\n", nullptr);
~~ ^~~~~~~
I believe that's _too_ pedantic. It is well and proper to pass nullptr to a %p
without casting it.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>
--1625072400.43e6eee3.8295--
[Attachment #3 (text/plain)]
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic