[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linuxbios
Subject:    [coreboot] Should AMD CIMx SB900 work for the A68?
From:       Corey Osgood <corey.osgood () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-06-27 23:37:48
Message-ID: CAD7TghJX2WczDN8LjGo34PHH3hGMG4R_2Y_rxf_4bK2AykmzUA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Hi,

I'm currently looking into porting coreboot to the Biostar A68I-350, which
has the E-350 CPU/NB and A68 southbridge. I'm not very familiar with the
AMD end of coreboot or their naming system, but looking at the PCI IDs, it
looks like the A68 is an SB900 (lspci -nn attached). I guess my questions
boil down to:

Is this right?
Has the CIMx/SB900 code had any testing? Any problems with it?
Is there any A68-specific errata that needs to be applied?
Is this there any difference between this E-350 and the one that's
supported on the ASRock board, with the A50M, being hudson m1 vs d3?

Thanks,
Corey

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>Hi,<br><br>I&#39;m currently looking into porting \
coreboot to the Biostar A68I-350, which has the E-350 CPU/NB and A68 southbridge. \
I&#39;m not very familiar with the AMD end of coreboot or their naming system, but \
looking at the PCI IDs, it looks like the A68 is an SB900 (lspci -nn attached). I \
guess my questions boil down to:<br> <br></div>Is this right?<br></div>Has the \
CIMx/SB900 code had any testing? Any problems with it?<br></div>Is there any \
A68-specific errata that needs to be applied?<br></div><div>Is this there any \
difference between this E-350 and the one that&#39;s supported on the ASRock board, \
with the A50M, being hudson m1 vs d3?<br> \
</div><div><br></div>Thanks,<br>Corey<br></div>

--047d7b10c993fbcd0e04e02b3f40--


["lspci.nn" (application/octet-stream)]

-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]