[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-xfs
Subject:    Re: loop-6 and the XFS tree
From:       Seth Mos <knuffie () xs4all ! nl>
Date:       2001-02-28 14:32:37
[Download RAW message or body]

At 14:56 28-2-2001 +0100, you wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 28 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > should look like. Make the size_t unsigned int instead in loop
> > > and rd.
> >
> > My mistake, I was looking at the wrong function. There's no
> > mixup in the xfs tree.
>
>I would provide a patch for rd too, but the tree still has the kgcc
>stupidity that prevents me from compiling. Yes I could fix it easily,
>but it annoys me heavily that such a change was made blindly
>assuming that we all need kgcc. So I'm holding further contributions
>for now until this is fixed -- yes I'm silly, but so is this
>assumption.

I agree, I build the tree more often on non redhat 7 boxes.
Btw, gcc 2.95.2 seems to work under debian 2.2_r2.
Not really tested, but it compiles and mounting worked.


>--
>Jens Axboe

--
Seth
Has anybody seen my lightbulb?
I _really_ need some light here.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]