[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-xfs
Subject: Re: Preemptive kernel patch on top of XFS
From: Sean Neakums <sneakums () zork ! net>
Date: 2001-12-27 1:00:10
[Download RAW message or body]
begin Eric Sandeen quotation:
> On Wed, 2001-12-26 at 17:36, drr@chpc.utah.edu wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Alp ATICI wrote:
>>
>> > Which patch should we apply to the kernel first?
>> My general rule is to apply bigger, more intrusive patches first, so I do
>> XFS before preemption.
>>
> I did it this way (XFS first) and I don't recall any problems. If
> there was a merge conflict, it was trivial to resolve.
The preempt patch has been applying cleanly to SGI's CVS tree for me
since I started using it, round about the .15 pre-patches. It works
great, too.
--
///////////////// | | The spark of a pin
<sneakums@zork.net> | (require 'gnu) | dropping, falling feather-like.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ | | There is too much noise.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic