[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-virtualization
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost-net: revert vhost_exceeds_maxpend logic to its original
From:       Koichiro Den <den () klaipeden ! com>
Date:       2017-08-21 13:32:20
Message-ID: 1503322340.8694.9.camel () klaipeden ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 20:40 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> On 2017年08月21日 11:06, Jason Wang wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 2017年08月19日 14:41, Koichiro Den wrote:
> > > To depend on vq.num and the usage of VHOST_MAX_PEND is not succinct
> > > and in some case unexpected, so revert its logic part only.
> > 
> > Hi:
> > 
> > Could you explain a little bit more on the case that is was not 
> > sufficent?
> > 
> > Thanks
> 
> Just have another thought.
> 
> I wonder whether or not just use ulimit(memlock) is better here. It 
> looks more flexible.
> 
> Thanks
It sounds a better approach, though at present I have got no idea how much
portion it should be.

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]