[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-virtualization
Subject:    [PATCH net-next V4 1/6] ptr_ring: support zero length ring
From:       Jason Wang <jasowang () redhat ! com>
Date:       2016-06-30 6:45:31
Message-ID: 1467269136-8082-2-git-send-email-jasowang () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Sometimes, we need zero length ring. But current code will crash since
we don't do any check before accessing the ring. This patch fixes this.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
index 562a65e..d78b8b8 100644
--- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
+++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static inline bool ptr_ring_full_bh(struct ptr_ring *r)
  */
 static inline int __ptr_ring_produce(struct ptr_ring *r, void *ptr)
 {
-	if (r->queue[r->producer])
+	if (unlikely(!r->size) || r->queue[r->producer])
 		return -ENOSPC;
 
 	r->queue[r->producer++] = ptr;
@@ -164,7 +164,9 @@ static inline int ptr_ring_produce_bh(struct ptr_ring *r, void *ptr)
  */
 static inline void *__ptr_ring_peek(struct ptr_ring *r)
 {
-	return r->queue[r->consumer];
+	if (likely(r->size))
+		return r->queue[r->consumer];
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 /* Note: callers invoking this in a loop must use a compiler barrier,
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]