[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-virtual-server
Subject:    RE: LVS/Piranha and Direct Routing example
From:       "Peter Mueller" <pmueller () sidestep ! com>
Date:       2004-07-19 16:54:18
Message-ID: 1C8FFEE4F601A74EBF7E78E38EA5E53830D2EC () mailbox ! jayst ! sidestep ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

webmail..
 
Since you bought a support contract with RH I would call them on the phone and have \
them walk you through every detail.  Get a level-2 tech or better (escelate from the \
start) and find out all the juicy details.  A good starting point might be the \
mailing list archive, \
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&w=2&r=1&s=lvs.cf&q=b.  This link \
has a search already entered for lvs.cf.  It has about 30 results, so it looks \
appropriate.  
RE : Ciscos -- in my experience Cisco load-balancers suck.  Then again I haven't used \
anything but LVS since the local director days.  There's been no need.  
P

________________________________

From: lvs-users-bounces@LinuxVirtualServer.org on behalf of Farrell, Doug
Sent: Mon 7/19/2004 7:20 AM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: RE: LVS/Piranha and Direct Routing example



Since this is a corporate environment we looked to a RedHat solution first, so we \
bough the RedHat Cluster Suite, which includes Piranha. I suppose if I knew more \
before I started this I might have tried Ultra Monkey first, or perhaps straight LVS \
code, but live and learn. I'm not even sure those would have been acceptable to my \
managers. They are getting pressure from our network services people that we should \
just buy a Cisco load balancer and mind our own business. :)

Doug

-----Original Message-----
From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme [mailto:kjetilho@ifi.uio.no]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 9:42 AM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list
Subject: RE: LVS/Piranha and Direct Routing example


On man, 2004-07-19 at 07:35 -0400, Farrell, Doug wrote:
> Thanks for the information, that reflects my experience as well, that
> Piranah doesn't support DR. It looks like the LVS project itself does,
> but I'm not sure how to integrate that in with a Piranha system.

why stick to Piranha?  support?  then you need to file an enhancement
request with Red Hat (good luck :).  I'm actually a bit surprised that
WS includes Piranha at all, I can't find it in our channels (but I
didn't look very hard.)

we use Keepalived on WS 3.0, it works fine and is pretty easy to set up,
but it's without commercial support.  you can buy that from others if
you need it.
--
Kjetil T.

_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-request@LinuxVirtualServer.org
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-request@LinuxVirtualServer.org
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users



_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-request@LinuxVirtualServer.org
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]