[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-sparse
Subject:    Re: sparse error on __int128
From:       Tony Camuso <tcamuso () redhat ! com>
Date:       2016-01-25 18:42:58
Message-ID: 56A66CB2.5040707 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 01/25/2016 12:47 PM, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:06:33AM -0500, Tony Camuso wrote:
> ...
>
>>> Now, of course, one could argue that sparse should also define __int128
>>> on platforms where gcc define it, on x86_64 thus.
>
> ...
>
>> So, I will apply the argument you so graciously supplied and posit that sparse
>> should define __int128 on platforms where gcc defines it, e.g. x86_64. :)
>>
>> It doesn't seem like a very intrusive change.
>
>
> Hehe :)
> Feel like writing a patch for it?
>
> Luc
>

Sure! ;)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]