[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-sparc
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 16/17] [RFC] arch: turn -Wmissing-prototypes off conditionally
From:       "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd () arndb ! de>
Date:       2023-08-12 8:02:07
Message-ID: 13f9c06a-f840-4010-ae2f-97d8b2883e76 () app ! fastmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023, at 22:09, Stafford Horne wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 04:19:34PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

> > arch/openrisc/mm/fault.c:44:17: error: no previous prototype for 'do_page_fault' \
> > [-Werror=missing-prototypes] arch/openrisc/mm/tlb.c:188:13: error: no previous \
> > prototype for 'tlb_init' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> 
> I'll try to get these fixed for 6.6.  I was looking at them recently but did not
> actually make any changes and just put on my TODO.  Your series moves it up in
> priority and it should be easy to get the fixes out.

Thanks!

Since we already have the majority of architecture maintainers stepping
in to fix the warnings, I wonder if I should just drop my patch 16/17
completely and let the others handle it as well rather than shutting up
the warnings. Only the asm-offsets change is really needed to compile
test most of the kernel even with CONFIG_WERROR, and without that this
is just some harmless output.

    Arnd


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]