[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-sparc
Subject:    Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/7] linux/include: add non-atomic version of xchg
From:       Andi Shyti <andi.shyti () linux ! intel ! com>
Date:       2023-02-27 9:53:57
Message-ID: Y/x9tclWV/lqBMzZ () ashyti-mobl2 ! lan
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Andrzej,

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 04:44:45PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The pattern of setting variable with new value and returning old
> one is very common in kernel. Usually atomicity of the operation
> is not required, so xchg seems to be suboptimal and confusing in
> such cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>

Thanks,
Andi
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]