[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-sctp
Subject:    Re: Problem gettting lksctp-tools 1.0.15 func_tests to work on CentOS 6.4
From:       Daniel Borkmann <dborkman () redhat ! com>
Date:       2013-11-06 14:35:40
Message-ID: 527A53BC.8050207 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 11/06/2013 03:16 PM, Jeff Carter wrote:
> I've installed lksctp-tools-1.0.15 on a CentOS 6.4 system with the following \
> kernel: 
> Linux version 2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64 (mockbuild@c6b9.bsys.dev.centos.org) (gcc \
> version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Tue Apr 23 19:29:00 UTC \
> 2013 
> When I attempt to build/run the v4test, I get failures in test_sockopt, \
> test_tcp_style, test_1_to_1_send, and test_1_to_1_sendmsg.

Which errors concretely?

> Also, a "successful" run of the test suite results in the kernel logging these \
> messages: 
> Nov  6 05:49:16 kernel: SCTP: Use of int in maxseg socket option deprecated
> Nov  6 05:49:16 kernel: SCTP: Use struct sctp_assoc_value instead
> 
> All the failing tests report "BROK : bind: Address already in use". With \
> test_sockopt, it is at step 5. It appears that it is trying to set up a new set of \
> client/server sockets immediately after closing the sockets from the previous test, \
> but using the same IP/port.

Yep, there's an upstream fix that you are missing:

commit 8c98653f05534acd1cb07ea4929702a3659177d1
Author: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Feb 1 04:37:43 2013 +0000

     sctp: sctp_close: fix release of bindings for deferred call_rcu's

> Is the correct change more likely to be adding SO_REUSEADDR, or moving each test to \
> its own set of ports? 
> Jeff Carter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]