[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-s390
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] ipmi: Convert from tasklet to BH workqueue
From: Allen <allen.lkml () gmail ! com>
Date: 2024-03-28 19:58:49
Message-ID: CAOMdWS+KrT2dK0XiEkZJT0aHnre1sr6gMMSkdxuXZaUh5e2e8Q () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
> > > >
> > > > Fair point. Could you please let me know once you have had a chance to test
> > > > these changes. Meanwhile, I will work on RFC wherein IPMI will have its own
> > > > workqueue.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for taking time out to review.
> > >
> > > After looking and thinking about it a bit, a BH context is still
> > > probably the best for this.
> > >
> > > I have tested this patch under load and various scenarios and it seems
> > > to work ok. So:
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
> > > Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
> > >
> > > Or I can take this into my tree.
> > >
> > > -corey
> >
> > Thank you very much. I think it should be okay for you to carry it into
> > your tree.
>
> Ok, it's in my for-next tree. I fixed the directory reference, and I
> changed all the comments where you changed "tasklet" to "work" to
> instead say "workqueue".
>
Thank you very much for fixing it.
- Allen
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic