[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-s390
Subject:    Re: [PATCH v5 00/24] Convert the posix_clock_operations and k_clock structure to ready for 2038
From:       Baolin Wang <baolin.wang () linaro ! org>
Date:       2015-06-15 2:27:53
Message-ID: CAMz4ku+yt=DWctKj+S4mTCKna-CyfXkhJhWLkJecBBXed39A7Q () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 12 June 2015 at 21:16, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
> Sigh. Again threading of the series failed. Some patches are, the
> whole series is not. Can you please get your tools straight?
>
> You neither managed to cc me on the security patch.
>
>> - Modify the subject line and the changelog:
>
>>   timekeeping: Change the implementation of timekeeping_clocktai()
>
> Sigh. How is that better than the previous one? It's more accurate,
> but equally useless.
>
> And of course you did not address my request to change the macro mess
> in
>
>>   posix-timers: Introduce {get,put}_timespec and {get,put}_itimerspec
>
> according to the discussion with Arnd.
>
> Thanks,
>
>         tglx

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for your comments, and i'll fix these problems you point out.

-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]