[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-s390
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 13/13] s390/irq: make return of 0 explicit
From:       Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens () de ! ibm ! com>
Date:       2014-05-19 6:03:18
Message-ID: 20140519060318.GA4459 () osiris
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:31:15AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
> 
> Delete unnecessary local variable whose value is always 0 and that hides
> the fact that the result is always 0.
> 
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
> 
> ---
>  arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.c |    6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.c b/arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.c
> index 276f2e2..28b2760 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.c
> @@ -212,10 +212,8 @@ static void init_all_cpu_buffers(void)
>  static int prepare_cpu_buffers(void)
>  {
>  	int cpu;
> -	int rc;
>  	struct hws_cpu_buffer *cb;
> 
> -	rc = 0;
>  	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>  		cb = &per_cpu(sampler_cpu_buffer, cpu);
>  		atomic_set(&cb->ext_params, 0);
> @@ -231,7 +229,7 @@ static int prepare_cpu_buffers(void)
>  		cb->stop_mode = 0;
>  	}
> 
> -	return rc;
> +	return 0;
>  }

Thanks Julia,

I applied a slightly different version which also turns prepare_cpu_buffers
into a void returning function.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]