[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-rt-users
Subject:    Re: [4.4.4-rt11] Possiblie recursive locking detected in kswapd / mb_cache_shrink_scan()
From:       Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy () linutronix ! de>
Date:       2016-03-30 8:16:26
Message-ID: 56FB8B5A.8 () linutronix ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On 03/30/2016 01:14 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 01:20:02PM -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 05:04:44PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> 
> The problem isn't that _all_ instances of the hlist_bl_head will share a
> lockdep class...it's that instances which are INIT_HLIST_BL_HEAD()'d _within
> the same compilation unit_ will share a lockdep class.

no, that is okay. No, that is actually all good. I must have mixed up
the lock inits. Sorry for the confusion. After looking at it again it
is all good.

Please send a proper patch and I add it to the queue.

> 
> 
>   Josh
> 
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]