[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-raid
Subject: Re: No response?
From: David Dougall <davidd () et ! byu ! edu>
Date: 2005-01-20 19:51:18
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0501201249550.19586 () lewis ! et ! byu ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]
Unfortunately my email client wrapped the line. It is not sda. It is
actually sdb.
--David Dougall
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> David Dougall <davidd@et.byu.edu> wrote:
> > Jan 10 11:56:06 linux-sg2 kernel: SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id 0
> > lun 47
> > return code = 8000002
>
> That is sda.
>
> > Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel: I/O error: dev 08:10, sector 343219280
>
> Well, I don't really understand - that is sdb, no? No? (or sda10 if the
> numbers are in decimal instead of hex).
>
> I don't know why sda and sdb seem to be confused! The "lun 47" also has
> me wondering!
>
> > Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel: Info fld=0xc7c0181, Current sd08:10:
> > sense key
> > Hardware Error
> > Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel: I/O error: dev 08:10, sector 392
>
> sdb, very insistently, at a completely different sector. Looks belly
> up.
>
> > Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel: SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id 0
> > lun 47
> > return code = 8000002
>
> But 0:0:0 should be sda!
>
> > Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel: I/O error: dev 08:10, sector 209453441
> > Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel: I/O error in filesystem
> > ("device-mapper(254,1)
> > ") meta-data dev device-mapper(254,1) block 0x18fa318f
> > ("xlog_iodone") err
> > or 5 buf count 2048
> > Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel:
> > xfs_force_shutdown(device-mapper(254,1),0x2) c
> > alled from line 966 of file xfs_log.c. Return address = 0xc0246d9b
> > Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel: Filesystem "device-mapper(254,1)": Log
> > I/O Err
> > or Detected. Shutting down filesystem: device-mapper(254,1)
> > Jan 10 11:56:08 linux-sg2 kernel: Please umount the filesystem, and
> > rectify the
> > problem(s)
> >
> >
> > I don't see any error messages from md in any of these logs.
>
> Why is the device mapper implicated? Doesn't that mean that you are
> using LVM and not raid? 2.4.26, you said? Hmm.
>
> Peter
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic