[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-pci
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 7/10] PCI / Hot-plug: Query _OSC before requesting controls
From:       Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji () jp ! fujitsu ! com>
Date:       2010-08-09 1:22:18
Message-ID: 4C5F584A.3050009 () jp ! fujitsu ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

(2010/08/06 19:34), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, August 06, 2010, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
>> (2010/08/06 10:11), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl>
>>>
>>> It generally is unsafe to call acpi_pci_osc_control_set() without
>>> checking what _OSC bits the BIOS is willing to grant control of,
>>> because control of some _OSC bits may be granted even if
>>> acpi_pci_osc_control_set() returns AE_SUPPORT.  Therefore make
>>> acpi_get_hp_hw_control_from_firmware() use
>>> acpi_pci_osc_control_query() to check if the BIOS will grant
>>> OSC_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL before calling acpi_pci_osc_control_set().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/pci/hotplug/acpi_pcihp.c |    6 ++++--
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpi_pcihp.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpi_pcihp.c
>>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpi_pcihp.c
>>> @@ -358,11 +358,13 @@ int acpi_get_hp_hw_control_from_firmware
>>>   		acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME,&string);
>>>   		dbg("Trying to get hotplug control for %s\n",
>>>   				(char *)string.pointer);
>>> +		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_query(handle,&flags);
>>> +		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)
>>> +		    || !(flags&  OSC_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
>>> +			goto no_control;
>>>   		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, flags);
>>>   		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
>>>   			goto got_one;
>>> -		if (status == AE_SUPPORT)
>>> -			goto no_control;
>>>   		kfree(string.pointer);
>>>   		string = (struct acpi_buffer){ ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>>>   	}
>>
>> This breaks fallback mechanism for OSHP, doesn't it?
>
> Hmm, well.  Can you please elaborate a bit?
>
> I guess you mean that the last two statements should be executed if
> acpi_pci_osc_control_query() returns error code, is that correct?
>

On legacy platform, firmware provides OSHP method instead of _OSC method
to grant native hot-plug control to OS. For this reason, current code
evaluates OSHP method if _OSC evaluation failed with error code other
than AE_SUPPORT (ex. "AE_NOT_FOUND" would be returned on the legacy
platform that provides OSHP instead of _OSC).

So I think Hidetoshi meant that

>>> +		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_query(handle,&flags);
>>> +		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)
>>> +		    || !(flags&  OSC_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
>>> +			goto no_control;

should be

	status = acpi_pci_osc_control_query(handle,&flags);
	if (status == AE_SUPPORT)
		goto no_control;

Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]