[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-omap
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 12/14] media: wl128x-radio: move from TI_ST to hci_ll driver
From:       Marcel Holtmann <marcel () holtmann ! org>
Date:       2018-12-23 15:56:47
Message-ID: C85D80C9-2B00-4161-B934-9D70E2B173D0 () holtmann ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Sebastian,

> This updates the wl128x-radio driver to be used with hci_ll
> instead of the deprecated TI_ST driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c                | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/media/radio/wl128x/Kconfig        |   2 +-
> drivers/media/radio/wl128x/fmdrv.h        |   1 +
> drivers/media/radio/wl128x/fmdrv_common.c | 101 ++-----------------
> include/linux/ti_wilink_st.h              |   2 +
> 5 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c
> index 3e767f245ed5..6bcba57e9c9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
> #include <linux/skbuff.h>
> #include <linux/ti_wilink_st.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> 
> #include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
> #include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
> @@ -62,6 +63,7 @@
> #define HCI_VS_UPDATE_UART_HCI_BAUDRATE		0xff36
> 
> /* HCILL commands */
> +#define HCILL_FM_RADIO		0x08
> #define HCILL_GO_TO_SLEEP_IND	0x30
> #define HCILL_GO_TO_SLEEP_ACK	0x31
> #define HCILL_WAKE_UP_IND	0x32
> @@ -81,6 +83,10 @@ struct ll_device {
> 	struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio;
> 	struct clk *ext_clk;
> 	bdaddr_t bdaddr;
> +
> +	struct platform_device *fmdev;
> +	void (*fm_handler) (void *, struct sk_buff *);
> +	void *fm_drvdata;
> };
> 
> struct ll_struct {
> @@ -161,6 +167,35 @@ static int ll_flush(struct hci_uart *hu)
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> +static int ll_register_fm(struct ll_device *lldev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &lldev->serdev->dev;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (!of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "ti,wl1281-st") &&
> +	    !of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "ti,wl1283-st") &&
> +	    !of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "ti,wl1285-st"))
> +		return -ENODEV;

do we really want to hardcode this here? Isn't there some HCI vendor command or some \
better DT description that we can use to decide when to register this platform \
device.

> +
> +	lldev->fmdev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "wl128x-fm",
> +		PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, NULL, 0);

Fix the indentation please to following networking coding style.

> +	err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(lldev->fmdev);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "cannot register FM radio subdevice: %d\n", err);
> +		lldev->fmdev = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void ll_unregister_fm(struct ll_device *lldev)
> +{
> +	if (!lldev->fmdev)
> +		return;
> +	platform_device_unregister(lldev->fmdev);
> +	lldev->fmdev = NULL;
> +}
> +
> /* Close protocol */
> static int ll_close(struct hci_uart *hu)
> {
> @@ -178,6 +213,8 @@ static int ll_close(struct hci_uart *hu)
> 		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lldev->enable_gpio, 0);
> 
> 		clk_disable_unprepare(lldev->ext_clk);
> +
> +		ll_unregister_fm(lldev);
> 	}
> 
> 	hu->priv = NULL;
> @@ -313,18 +350,11 @@ static void ll_device_woke_up(struct hci_uart *hu)
> 	hci_uart_tx_wakeup(hu);
> }
> 
> -/* Enqueue frame for transmittion (padding, crc, etc) */
> -/* may be called from two simultaneous tasklets */
> -static int ll_enqueue(struct hci_uart *hu, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static int ll_enqueue_prefixed(struct hci_uart *hu, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> 	unsigned long flags = 0;
> 	struct ll_struct *ll = hu->priv;
> 
> -	BT_DBG("hu %p skb %p", hu, skb);
> -
> -	/* Prepend skb with frame type */
> -	memcpy(skb_push(skb, 1), &hci_skb_pkt_type(skb), 1);
> -
> 	/* lock hcill state */
> 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ll->hcill_lock, flags);
> 
> @@ -361,6 +391,18 @@ static int ll_enqueue(struct hci_uart *hu, struct sk_buff \
> *skb)  return 0;
> }
> 
> +/* Enqueue frame for transmittion (padding, crc, etc) */
> +/* may be called from two simultaneous tasklets */
> +static int ll_enqueue(struct hci_uart *hu, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	BT_DBG("hu %p skb %p", hu, skb);
> +
> +	/* Prepend skb with frame type */
> +	memcpy(skb_push(skb, 1), &hci_skb_pkt_type(skb), 1);
> +
> +	return ll_enqueue_prefixed(hu, skb);
> +}
> +
> static int ll_recv_frame(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> 	struct hci_uart *hu = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
> @@ -390,6 +432,32 @@ static int ll_recv_frame(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff \
> *skb)  return 0;
> }
> 
> +static int ll_recv_radio(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	struct hci_uart *hu = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
> +	struct serdev_device *serdev = hu->serdev;
> +	struct ll_device *lldev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev);
> +
> +	if (!lldev->fm_handler) {
> +		kfree_skb(skb);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Prepend skb with frame type */
> +	memcpy(skb_push(skb, 1), &hci_skb_pkt_type(skb), 1);
> +
> +	lldev->fm_handler(lldev->fm_drvdata, skb);

So I have no idea why we bother adding the frame type here. What is the purpose. I \
think this is useless and we better fix the radio driver if that is what is expected.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#define LL_RECV_FM_RADIO \
> +	.type = HCILL_FM_RADIO, \
> +	.hlen = 1, \
> +	.loff = 0, \
> +	.lsize = 1, \
> +	.maxlen = 0xff
> +
> #define LL_RECV_SLEEP_IND \
> 	.type = HCILL_GO_TO_SLEEP_IND, \
> 	.hlen = 0, \
> @@ -422,6 +490,7 @@ static const struct h4_recv_pkt ll_recv_pkts[] = {
> 	{ H4_RECV_ACL,       .recv = hci_recv_frame },
> 	{ H4_RECV_SCO,       .recv = hci_recv_frame },
> 	{ H4_RECV_EVENT,     .recv = hci_recv_frame },
> +	{ LL_RECV_FM_RADIO,  .recv = ll_recv_radio },
> 	{ LL_RECV_SLEEP_IND, .recv = ll_recv_frame  },
> 	{ LL_RECV_SLEEP_ACK, .recv = ll_recv_frame  },
> 	{ LL_RECV_WAKE_IND,  .recv = ll_recv_frame  },
> @@ -669,11 +738,41 @@ static int ll_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> +	/* We intentionally ignore failures and proceed without FM device */
> +	ll_register_fm(lldev);
> +
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> static const struct hci_uart_proto llp;
> 
> +void hci_ti_set_fm_handler(struct device *dev, void (*recv_handler) (void *, \
> struct sk_buff *), void *drvdata) +{
> +	struct serdev_device *serdev = to_serdev_device(dev);
> +	struct ll_device *lldev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev);
> +
> +	lldev->fm_drvdata = drvdata;
> +	lldev->fm_handler = recv_handler;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hci_ti_set_fm_handler);
> +
> +int hci_ti_fm_send(struct device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	struct serdev_device *serdev = to_serdev_device(dev);
> +	struct ll_device *lldev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev);
> +	struct hci_uart *hu = &lldev->hu;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	hci_skb_pkt_type(skb) = HCILL_FM_RADIO;
> +	ret = ll_enqueue_prefixed(hu, skb);

This is the same as above, lets have the radio driver not add this H:4 protocol type \
in the first place. It is really pointless that this driver tries to hack around it.

> +
> +	if (!ret)
> +		hci_uart_tx_wakeup(hu);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hci_ti_fm_send);
> +
> static int hci_ti_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev)
> {
> 	struct hci_uart *hu;
> diff --git a/drivers/media/radio/wl128x/Kconfig \
> b/drivers/media/radio/wl128x/Kconfig index 64b66bbdae72..847b3ed92639 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/radio/wl128x/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/media/radio/wl128x/Kconfig
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> menu "Texas Instruments WL128x FM driver (ST based)"
> config RADIO_WL128X
> 	tristate "Texas Instruments WL128x FM Radio"
> -	depends on VIDEO_V4L2 && RFKILL && TTY && TI_ST
> +	depends on VIDEO_V4L2 && RFKILL && TTY && BT_HCIUART_LL
> 	depends on GPIOLIB || COMPILE_TEST
> 	help
> 	  Choose Y here if you have this FM radio chip.
> diff --git a/drivers/media/radio/wl128x/fmdrv.h \
> b/drivers/media/radio/wl128x/fmdrv.h index 4a337f38cfc9..717a8a3f533f 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/radio/wl128x/fmdrv.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/radio/wl128x/fmdrv.h
> @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ struct fmtx_data {
> 
> /* FM driver operation structure */
> struct fmdev {
> +	struct device *dev;
> 	struct video_device radio_dev;	/* V4L2 video device pointer */
> 	struct v4l2_device v4l2_dev;	/* V4L2 top level struct */
> 	struct snd_card *card;	/* Card which holds FM mixer controls */
> diff --git a/drivers/media/radio/wl128x/fmdrv_common.c \
> b/drivers/media/radio/wl128x/fmdrv_common.c index c20d518af4f3..88a2197c4815 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/radio/wl128x/fmdrv_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/radio/wl128x/fmdrv_common.c
> @@ -172,9 +172,6 @@ static int_handler_prototype int_handler_table[] = {
> 	fm_irq_handle_intmsk_cmd_resp
> };
> 
> -static long (*g_st_write) (struct sk_buff *skb);
> -static struct completion wait_for_fmdrv_reg_comp;
> -
> static inline void fm_irq_call(struct fmdev *fmdev)
> {
> 	fmdev->irq_info.handlers[fmdev->irq_info.stage](fmdev);
> @@ -373,7 +370,7 @@ static void send_tasklet(unsigned long arg)
> 
> 	/* Write FM packet to ST driver */
> 	dump_tx_skb_data(skb);
> -	len = g_st_write(skb);
> +	len = hci_ti_fm_send(fmdev->dev->parent, skb);
> 	if (len < 0) {
> 		kfree_skb(skb);
> 		fmdev->resp_comp = NULL;
> @@ -1441,42 +1438,13 @@ int fmc_get_mode(struct fmdev *fmdev, u8 *fmmode)
> }
> 
> /* Called by ST layer when FM packet is available */
> -static long fm_st_receive(void *arg, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static void fm_st_receive(void *arg, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> -	struct fmdev *fmdev;
> -
> -	fmdev = (struct fmdev *)arg;
> -
> -	if (skb == NULL) {
> -		fmerr("Invalid SKB received from ST\n");
> -		return -EFAULT;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (skb->cb[0] != FM_PKT_LOGICAL_CHAN_NUMBER) {
> -		fmerr("Received SKB (%p) is not FM Channel 8 pkt\n", skb);
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> +	struct fmdev *fmdev = (struct fmdev *) arg;
> 
> -	memcpy(skb_push(skb, 1), &skb->cb[0], 1);
> 	dump_rx_skb_data(skb);
> -
> 	skb_queue_tail(&fmdev->rx_q, skb);
> 	tasklet_schedule(&fmdev->rx_task);
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Called by ST layer to indicate protocol registration completion
> - * status.
> - */
> -static void fm_st_reg_comp_cb(void *arg, int data)
> -{
> -	struct fmdev *fmdev;
> -
> -	fmdev = (struct fmdev *)arg;
> -	fmdev->streg_cbdata = data;
> -	complete(&wait_for_fmdrv_reg_comp);
> }
> 
> /*
> @@ -1485,59 +1453,12 @@ static void fm_st_reg_comp_cb(void *arg, int data)
> */
> void fmc_prepare(struct fmdev *fmdev)
> {
> -	static struct st_proto_s fm_st_proto;
> -
> 	if (test_bit(FM_CORE_READY, &fmdev->flag)) {
> 		fmdbg("FM Core is already up\n");
> 		return;
> 	}
> 
> -	memset(&fm_st_proto, 0, sizeof(fm_st_proto));
> -	fm_st_proto.recv = fm_st_receive;
> -	fm_st_proto.match_packet = NULL;
> -	fm_st_proto.reg_complete_cb = fm_st_reg_comp_cb;
> -	fm_st_proto.write = NULL; /* TI ST driver will fill write pointer */
> -	fm_st_proto.priv_data = fmdev;
> -	fm_st_proto.chnl_id = 0x08;
> -	fm_st_proto.max_frame_size = 0xff;
> -	fm_st_proto.hdr_len = 1;
> -	fm_st_proto.offset_len_in_hdr = 0;
> -	fm_st_proto.len_size = 1;
> -	fm_st_proto.reserve = 1;
> -
> -	ret = st_register(&fm_st_proto);
> -	if (ret == -EINPROGRESS) {
> -		init_completion(&wait_for_fmdrv_reg_comp);
> -		fmdev->streg_cbdata = -EINPROGRESS;
> -		fmdbg("%s waiting for ST reg completion signal\n", __func__);
> -
> -		if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&wait_for_fmdrv_reg_comp,
> -						 FM_ST_REG_TIMEOUT)) {
> -			fmerr("Timeout(%d sec), didn't get reg completion signal from ST\n",
> -					jiffies_to_msecs(FM_ST_REG_TIMEOUT) / 1000);
> -			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> -		}
> -		if (fmdev->streg_cbdata != 0) {
> -			fmerr("ST reg comp CB called with error status %d\n",
> -			      fmdev->streg_cbdata);
> -			return -EAGAIN;
> -		}
> -
> -		ret = 0;
> -	} else if (ret == -1) {
> -		fmerr("st_register failed %d\n", ret);
> -		return -EAGAIN;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (fm_st_proto.write != NULL) {
> -		g_st_write = fm_st_proto.write;
> -	} else {
> -		fmerr("Failed to get ST write func pointer\n");
> -		ret = st_unregister(&fm_st_proto);
> -		if (ret < 0)
> -			fmerr("st_unregister failed %d\n", ret);
> -		return -EAGAIN;
> -	}
> +	hci_ti_set_fm_handler(fmdev->dev->parent, fm_st_receive, fmdev);
> 
> 	spin_lock_init(&fmdev->rds_buff_lock);
> 	spin_lock_init(&fmdev->resp_skb_lock);
> @@ -1582,9 +1503,6 @@ void fmc_prepare(struct fmdev *fmdev)
> */
> void fmc_release(struct fmdev *fmdev)
> {
> -	static struct st_proto_s fm_st_proto;
> -	int ret;
> -
> 	if (!test_bit(FM_CORE_READY, &fmdev->flag)) {
> 		fmdbg("FM Core is already down\n");
> 		return;
> @@ -1601,15 +1519,7 @@ void fmc_release(struct fmdev *fmdev)
> 	fmdev->resp_comp = NULL;
> 	fmdev->rx.freq = 0;
> 
> -	memset(&fm_st_proto, 0, sizeof(fm_st_proto));
> -	fm_st_proto.chnl_id = 0x08;
> -
> -	ret = st_unregister(&fm_st_proto);
> -
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		fmerr("Failed to de-register FM from ST %d\n", ret);
> -	else
> -		fmdbg("Successfully unregistered from ST\n");
> +	hci_ti_set_fm_handler(fmdev->dev->parent, NULL, NULL);
> 
> 	clear_bit(FM_CORE_READY, &fmdev->flag);
> }
> @@ -1624,6 +1534,7 @@ static int wl128x_fm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 	if (!fmdev)
> 		return -ENOMEM;
> 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, fmdev);
> +	fmdev->dev = &pdev->dev;
> 
> 	fmdev->rx.rds.buf_size = default_rds_buf * FM_RDS_BLK_SIZE;
> 	fmdev->rx.rds.buff = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, fmdev->rx.rds.buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> diff --git a/include/linux/ti_wilink_st.h b/include/linux/ti_wilink_st.h
> index f2293028ab9d..a9de5654b0cd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ti_wilink_st.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ti_wilink_st.h
> @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ struct st_proto_s {
> extern long st_register(struct st_proto_s *);
> extern long st_unregister(struct st_proto_s *);
> 
> +void hci_ti_set_fm_handler(struct device *dev, void (*recv_handler) (void *, \
> struct sk_buff *), void *drvdata); +int hci_ti_fm_send(struct device *dev, struct \
> sk_buff *skb);

This really needs to be put somewhere else if we are removing the TI Wilink driver. \
This header file has to be removed as well.

I wonder really if we are not better having the Bluetooth HCI core provide an \
abstraction for a vendor channel. So that the HCI packets actually can flow through \
HCI monitor and be recorded via btmon. This would also mean that the driver could do \
something like hci_vnd_chan_add() and hci_vnd_chan_del() and use a struct \
hci_vnd_chan for callback handler hci_vnd_chan_send() functions.

On a side note, what is the protocol the TI FM radio is using anyway? Is that \
anywhere documented except the driver itself? Are they using HCI commands as well?

Regards

Marcel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]