[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-nfs
Subject:    Re: [NFS] Lock Failures when using sendmail and testlk...
From:       Stuart Sheldon <stu () actusa ! net>
Date:       2001-05-31 19:57:13
[Download RAW message or body]

That was it... For some reason ipchains was not allowing forwarding of
statd...

Thanks!

Stu


Tavis Barr wrote:
> 
> rpcinfo is just dependent on portmap being configured properly, the others
> are separate lines.  it's also possible you have an overzealous firewall.
> Try telnetting in on the ports that lockd and statd are running on and
> seeing if the connection is refused. also try opening your
> hosts.allow/deny setup and/or your firewall completely for a few minutes
> (if you are in a position to risk it) and see if that fixes things.  if so
> you'll know where to start.
> 
> good luck,
> tavis
> 
> On Thu, 31 May 2001, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
> 
> > I've got the hosts in hosts.allow as follows:
> >
> > portmap: host1, host2
> > statd: host1, host2
> > lockd: host1, host2
> > nfsd: host1, host2
> > mountd: host1, host2
> > rquotad: host1, host2
> >
> > And the hosts.deny has the same services followed by all...
> >
> > Besides, rpcinfo wouldn't work properly if it wasn't setup right, but
> > that said... Is it posible that the rpc.portmap that ships with
> > Slackware is bugged?
> >
> > Stu
> >
> >
> > Tavis Barr wrote:
> > >
> > > how about hosts.allow and hosts.deny?  do you have ALL:ALL in hosts.deny?
> > > nfs-utils (since 0.2.0) is tcpwrapped which means you have to explicitly
> > > specify lockd and statd.  (See the HOWTO.)
> > >
> > > On Wed, 30 May 2001, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Seth...
> > > >
> > > > But it still doesn't work... here is the rpcinfo to the client now...
> > > >
> > > >    program vers proto   port
> > > >     100000    2   tcp    111  portmapper
> > > >     100000    2   udp    111  portmapper
> > > >     100011    1   udp    673  rquotad
> > > >     100011    2   udp    673  rquotad
> > > >     100021    1   udp   1024  nlockmgr
> > > >     100021    3   udp   1024  nlockmgr
> > > >     100021    4   udp   1024  nlockmgr
> > > >     100024    1   udp    671  status
> > > >     100024    1   tcp    674  status
> > > >     100005    1   udp   1027  mountd
> > > >     100005    1   tcp   1024  mountd
> > > >     100005    2   udp   1027  mountd
> > > >     100005    2   tcp   1024  mountd
> > > >     100005    3   udp   1027  mountd
> > > >     100005    3   tcp   1024  mountd
> > > >     100003    2   udp   2049  nfs
> > > >     100003    3   udp   2049  nfs
> > > >
> > > > I've been commenting so much stuff in and out trying to get a line on
> > > > this that I forgot to load them back up...
> > > >
> > > > I'm running testlk -w /net/test and getting the errors... That should
> > > > work right? It seems to emulate the slow response of sendmail
> > > > perfectly... :)
> > > >
> > > > Stu
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Seth Vidal wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Here is rpcinfo ran from the server to the client:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    program vers proto   port
> > > > > >     100000    2   tcp    111  portmapper
> > > > > >     100000    2   udp    111  portmapper
> > > > > >     100021    1   udp   1024  nlockmgr
> > > > > >     100021    3   udp   1024  nlockmgr
> > > > > >     100021    4   udp   1024  nlockmgr
> > > > > >     100005    1   udp   1027  mountd
> > > > > >     100005    1   tcp   1024  mountd
> > > > > >     100005    2   udp   1027  mountd
> > > > > >     100005    2   tcp   1024  mountd
> > > > > >     100005    3   udp   1027  mountd
> > > > > >     100005    3   tcp   1024  mountd
> > > > > >     100003    2   udp   2049  nfs
> > > > > >     100003    3   udp   2049  nfs
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > no statd here.
> > > > >
> > > > > that will need to be running for locking to work.
> > > > > figure out why statd is not running and I think your problem will go away.
> > > > >
> > > > > -sv
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
> > > >
> >

_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]