[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-nfs
Subject:    Re: [RFC PATCH 02/18] kthread: Add API for iterant kthreads
From:       Petr Mladek <pmladek () suse ! cz>
Date:       2015-06-15 12:46:40
Message-ID: 20150615124640.GM9409 () pathway ! suse ! cz
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue 2015-06-09 15:23:49, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Petr.
> 
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:01:01PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > +static int kthread_iterant_fn(void *kti_ptr)
> > +{
> > +	struct kthread_iterant *kti = kti_ptr;
> > +	void *data = kti->data;
> > +
> > +	if (kti->init)
> > +		kti->init(data);
> > +
> > +	do {
> > +		if (kti->func)
> > +			kti->func(data);
> 
> Is supporting kthread_iterant w/o the body function intentional?  If
> so, did you have anything specific on mind for it?  I don't think it
> matters either way.  Just curious how this came to be.

Good question. It might make sense to add a warning for kthreads
with empty main function.

Best Regards,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]