[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-nfs
Subject: Re: [NFS] Poor NFS performance, kernel 2.6.6.
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust () fys ! uio ! no>
Date: 2004-05-28 19:19:28
Message-ID: 1085771968.3882.17.camel () lade ! trondhjem ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Pĺ fr , 28/05/2004 klokka 14:03, skreiv Harald Hannelius:
> I guess (as a total don't-know) that nfsd reads and writes files in a
> different way than local processes do. I read somewhere something about
> read-ahead but that was in 2.6.0-pre-something..
Hmm... The current readahead code does a load of crap in order to
determine whether or not the user is doing linear or random I/O. It may
be that the nfsd server with all its multi-threading and out-of-sequence
I/O is triggering the random I/O readahead code (which of course aims to
limit readahead).
Cheers
Trond
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&opĚk
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic