[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-netdev
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: do not initialise statics to 0 or NULL
From:       Greg KH <greg () kroah ! com>
Date:       2014-10-31 20:50:24
Message-ID: 20141031205024.GB20417 () kroah ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:48:08PM +0530, Balavasu wrote:
> This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl issue
> Error: do not initialise statics to 0 or NULL for time
> 
> Signed-off-by: Balavasu <kp.balavasu@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/do not instalise 0 | 10 +++++-----

That line doesn't look right, does it?

And why netdev and not the mailing list for the drivers/staging/ tree?

And again, I need a full name.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]