[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-msdos
Subject:    Re: dosemu-1.2.0 and unhandled exception
From:       Bart Oldeman <bartoldeman () users ! sourceforge ! net>
Date:       2004-01-19 18:37:32
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0401191831170.26103-100000 () pg5 ! enm ! bris ! ac ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, James B. Hiller wrote:

> Whichever you prefer.  I'm thinking it's not necessary to go back to
> 1.0.2.1, since it runs just fine in 1.2.0 from an hdimage - since the
> last email I did in fact do this an compare the two log results, and
> will post below for ref.  But if you think there's a diff that can
> be achieved going back to 1.0.2.1, let me know and I will.

no, if it runs fine from an hdimage in 1.2.0 then it doesn't make sense to
go back to 1.0.2.1 indeed -- most likely not a regression since you wrote
that you booted 1.0.2.1 from an hdimage.

It means that there are two possible causes
a) the DOS app tries to use direct access bypassing the "network drive"
b) DOSEMUs "network drive" implementation (MFS) is buggy.

if it's a) then you *have* to use an hdimage (or direct partition access,
which would mean you couldn't mount the partition at the same time) and
if it's b) we might be able to fix it.

I'll have a look at your other email to find out.

Bart

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]