[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-mmc
Subject:    Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: Drop unused properties
From:       Conor Dooley <conor.dooley () microchip ! com>
Date:       2023-08-30 8:34:06
Message-ID: 20230830-procedure-frostbite-56c751f7c276 () wendy
[Download RAW message or body]


On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 09:29:20AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/08/2023 08:50, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 11:18:44AM +0800, William Qiu wrote:
> >> Due to the change of tuning implementation, it's no longer necessary to
> >> use the "starfive,sysreg" property in dts, so drop the relevant
> >> description in dt-bindings here.
> > 
> > How does changing your software implantation invalidate a description of
> > the hardware?
> > 
> 
> Which is kind of proof that this syscon was just to substitute
> incomplete hardware description (e.g. missing clocks and phys). We
> should have rejected it. Just like we should reject them in the future.

:s I dunno what to do with this... I'm inclined to say not to remove it
from the binding or dts at all & only change the software.

> There are just few cases where syscon is reasonable. All others is just
> laziness. It's not only starfivetech, of course. Several other
> contributors do the same.

I'm not sure if laziness is fair, lack of understanding is usually more
likely.

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]