[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-mm
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: Force update of mem cgroup soft limit tree on usage excess
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen () linux ! intel ! com>
Date: 2021-02-27 0:56:28
Message-ID: 781634ee-ffb9-598d-fdb6-0ae6067448b7 () linux ! intel ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 2/26/21 12:52 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>
>> Michal,
>>
>> Let's take an extreme case where memcg 1 always generate the
>> first event and memcg 2 generates the rest of 128*8-1 events
>> and the pattern repeat.
>
> I do not follow. Events are per-memcg, aren't they?
> __this_cpu_read(memcg->vmstats_percpu->targets[target]);
> [...]
> __this_cpu_write(memcg->vmstats_percpu->targets[target], next);
>
You are right. My previous reasoning is incorrect as the sampling is done per memcg.
I'll do some additional debugging on why memcg is not on the tree.
Tim
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic