[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-mm
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 11/40] autonuma: define the autonuma flags
From:       Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad () darnok ! org>
Date:       2012-06-30 5:01:44
Message-ID: 20120630050143.GD3975 () localhost ! localdomain
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:55:51PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> These flags are the ones tweaked through sysfs, they control the
> behavior of autonuma, from enabling disabling it, to selecting various
> runtime options.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/autonuma_flags.h |   62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/autonuma_flags.h
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/autonuma_flags.h b/include/linux/autonuma_flags.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5e29a75
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/autonuma_flags.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_AUTONUMA_FLAGS_H
> +#define _LINUX_AUTONUMA_FLAGS_H
> +
> +enum autonuma_flag {
> +	AUTONUMA_FLAG,
> +	AUTONUMA_IMPOSSIBLE_FLAG,
> +	AUTONUMA_DEBUG_FLAG,
> +	AUTONUMA_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE_STRICT_FLAG,
> +	AUTONUMA_SCHED_CLONE_RESET_FLAG,
> +	AUTONUMA_SCHED_FORK_RESET_FLAG,
> +	AUTONUMA_SCAN_PMD_FLAG,
> +	AUTONUMA_SCAN_USE_WORKING_SET_FLAG,
> +	AUTONUMA_MIGRATE_DEFER_FLAG,
> +};
> +
> +extern unsigned long autonuma_flags;

I could not find the this variable in the preceding patches?
Which patch actually uses it?

Also, is there a way to force the AutoNUMA framework
from not initializing at all? Hold that thought, it probably
is in some of the other patches.

> +
> +static inline bool autonuma_enabled(void)
> +{
> +	return !!test_bit(AUTONUMA_FLAG, &autonuma_flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool autonuma_debug(void)
> +{
> +	return !!test_bit(AUTONUMA_DEBUG_FLAG, &autonuma_flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool autonuma_sched_load_balance_strict(void)
> +{
> +	return !!test_bit(AUTONUMA_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE_STRICT_FLAG,
> +			  &autonuma_flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool autonuma_sched_clone_reset(void)
> +{
> +	return !!test_bit(AUTONUMA_SCHED_CLONE_RESET_FLAG,
> +			  &autonuma_flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool autonuma_sched_fork_reset(void)
> +{
> +	return !!test_bit(AUTONUMA_SCHED_FORK_RESET_FLAG,
> +			  &autonuma_flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool autonuma_scan_pmd(void)
> +{
> +	return !!test_bit(AUTONUMA_SCAN_PMD_FLAG, &autonuma_flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool autonuma_scan_use_working_set(void)
> +{
> +	return !!test_bit(AUTONUMA_SCAN_USE_WORKING_SET_FLAG,
> +			  &autonuma_flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool autonuma_migrate_defer(void)
> +{
> +	return !!test_bit(AUTONUMA_MIGRATE_DEFER_FLAG, &autonuma_flags);
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_AUTONUMA_FLAGS_H */
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]