[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-mm
Subject:    Re: Kernel 2.6.8.1: swap storm of death - nr_requests > 1024 on swap partition
From:       Karl Vogel <karl.vogel () seagha ! com>
Date:       2004-08-31 17:50:07
Message-ID: 200408311950.09641.karl.vogel () seagha ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 31 August 2004 12:23, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 04:51:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com> wrote:
> > > What you think of this, which tries to address your comments
> >
> > Suggest you pass the scan_control structure down into pageout(), stick
> > `inflight' into struct scan_control and use some flag in scan_control to
>
> Done the scan_control modifications.

Took the patch for a spin.. it seems to behave ok here! No more OOMs.

Quick question: is it to be expected that when I run a calloc(500Mb) on my 
system, when X is up and amarok is streaming live audio, that everything 
(apps) freezes for a few seconds until the calloc task exits?!
The apps probably get pushed out to swap, but I would think that since these 
applications are running, that their pages are kept on the active list?! 
Setting swappiness to 0 doesn't make a difference.

Is there a concept of a minimum working set size of an application? (kind of 
the reverse of an RSS limit)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]