[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-media
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 1/6] netlink: fix missing destruction of rhash table in error case
From:       Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter () oracle ! com>
Date:       2022-05-31 11:25:51
Message-ID: 20220531112551.GT2146 () kadam
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 10:43:09AM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Sun, 2022-05-29 at 23:34 +0800, Chengguang Xu wrote:
> > Fix missing destruction(when '(--i) == 0') for error case in
> > netlink_proto_init().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>
> > ---
> >  net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > index 0cd91f813a3b..bd0b090a378b 100644
> > --- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > +++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > @@ -2887,7 +2887,7 @@ static int __init netlink_proto_init(void)
> >  	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LINKS; i++) {
> >  		if (rhashtable_init(&nl_table[i].hash,
> >  				    &netlink_rhashtable_params) < 0) {
> > -			while (--i > 0)
> > +			while (--i >= 0)
> >  				rhashtable_destroy(&nl_table[i].hash);
> >  			kfree(nl_table);
> >  			goto panic;
> 
> The patch looks correct to me, but it looks like each patch in this
> series is targeting a different tree. I suggest to re-send, splitting
> the series into individual patches, and sending each of them to the
> appropriate tree. You can retain Dan's Review tag.

Since it looks like you're going to be resending these then could you
add Fixes tags?  Please keep my Review tag.

regards,
dan carpenter

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]