[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-kernel
Subject: Re: can't mlockall() more than 128MB, is this a kernel limitiation ?
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa () zytor ! com>
Date: 2000-08-08 20:32:01
[Download RAW message or body]
Followup to: <20000808162724.D23518@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
By author: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Yes. And with check they need _two_ such processes to crash the
> machine, no? Okay, perhaps we can raise limit do 9/10 or total_memory
> - 16Meg; that should prevent them ranting ;-).
> Pavel
The check should be done on the total amount of memory mlocked in the
system. This may be something that we can't do until we have the
beancounter.
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic