[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    Re: can't mlockall() more than 128MB, is this a kernel limitiation ?
From:       "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa () zytor ! com>
Date:       2000-08-08 20:32:01
[Download RAW message or body]

Followup to:  <20000808162724.D23518@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
By author:    Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> 
> Yes. And with check they need _two_ such processes to crash the
> machine, no? Okay, perhaps we can raise limit do 9/10 or total_memory
> - 16Meg; that should prevent them ranting ;-).
> 								Pavel

The check should be done on the total amount of memory mlocked in the
system.  This may be something that we can't do until we have the
beancounter.

	-hpa
-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic