[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] asm*/resource.h fix for glibc
From:       "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery () kf8nh ! apk ! net>
Date:       1999-12-17 0:38:09
[Download RAW message or body]

In message <19991217011701.A23083@cistron.nl>, Miquel van Smoorenburg writes:
+-----
| According to Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH:
| > In message <83bn5f$923$1@enterprise.cistron.net>, Miquel van Smoorenburg 
| > writes:
| > | If glibc-devel has /usr/include/linux -> /usr/src/linux-2.2.5-20/include/
| linux
| > | is there any reason not to put the 2.2.5-20 kernel headers directly
| > | into /usr/include instead of via a symlink ?
| > 
| > Because some of us upgrade our kernels without going through the whole RPM 
| > rigmarole and would prefer to be able to change one or two symlinks instead
| > of copying all the headers?
| 
| But you don't NEED to upgrade the kernel headers in /usr/include if
| you upgrade the kernel. In fact that was the entire point of Linus'
| posting. And mine. Sigh
+--->8

When new ioctls etc. show up, we do.  In particular, I'm running 2.2.13ac3 
on RH5.2, so the old kernel includes (for 2.0.36) *are* wrong.

-- 
brandon s. allbery	   os/2,linux,solaris,perl	allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator	   kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt	  allbery@ece.cmu.edu
carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering			kf8nh
    We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]