Because Qt sets a trap for free software developers in
    > a way that most other proprietary programs do not.

    How is this different from writing free software for, say, MS Windows?

There is a certain amount of similarity: if people design their free
software to use the features of MS Windows, it will be useless to us.
But there are also major differences.

One difference is that MS Windows doesn't run on a GNU/Linux system.
So there's no danger that people will make non-free GNU/Linux systems
by adding MS Windows to the system.

Another difference is that everyone in our community is aware that MS
Windows is not free software.  The widespread anger and disgust that
people feel towards Microsoft also helps people resist the the idea of
switching to MS Windows.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html