[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-kernel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: check match table
From: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers () gmail ! com>
Date: 2017-09-30 23:22:34
Message-ID: 20170930232234.ue665ojgjkegjpag () lostoracle ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:36:03PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 26/09/2017 19:12, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Does this make any other checks redundant and removable?
>
> It would make sense to place it in cpu_has_kvm_support instead
cpu_has_kvm_support() or cpu_has_vmx()?
>, and the same in svm.c's has_svm.
I don't follow (but I also don't know what any of these three letter
acryonyms acronyms stand for), does svm depend on vmx or vice-versa?
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic