[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] net: sched: One function call less in em_meta_change() after error detection
From:       Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo () gmx ! de>
Date:       2015-01-31 22:51:25
Message-ID: 54CD5C6D.2040704 () gmx ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On 31.01.2015 23:20, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> I find that all these cases correspond to the current Linux coding
>>> style documentation, doesn't it?
>> 
>> Sure, I think it does.
> 
> Thanks for your acknowledgement.
> 
> 
>> But it was not coding style violation what I was reffering to.
> 
> Do you suggest any fine-tuning for the affected documentation
> so that I would tweak my update suggestion once more?
> 

No I dont think that any documentation has to be adjusted. If you agree
with me you should adjust the patch accordingly and resend it. Otherwise
keep it as it is.

Regards,
Lino
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]