[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    RE: device tree not the answer in the ARM world [was: Re: running Debian on a Cubieboard]
From:       Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386 () hotmail ! com>
Date:       2013-05-10 1:00:36
Message-ID: BLU177-W3584FC3A1BE197A6E3EA63C3A50 () phx ! gbl
[Download RAW message or body]

----------------------------------------
> From: yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com
> To: lkcl@lkcl.net; hancockrwd@gmail.com
> CC: david.goodenough@btconnect.com; debian-arm@lists.debian.org; \
>                 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk
> Subject: RE: device tree not the answer in the ARM world [was: Re: running Debian \
>                 on a Cubieboard]
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 17:56:33 -0700
> 
> > the economics of market forces don't work that way.
> > profit-maximising companies are pathologically and *LEGALLY* bound to
> > enact the articles of incorporation. so you'd need to show them that
> > it would hurt their profits to continue the way that they are going.
> I think legally bound is a myth, but that is off-topic for lkml of course.
And obviously it doesn't matter if it is actually required by law if they practically \
behave that way.

Yuhong Bao 		 	   		  --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]