[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    [PATCH 2/7] uprobes: Don't return success if alloc_uprobe() fails
From:       Oleg Nesterov <oleg () redhat ! com>
Date:       2012-09-30 19:42:01
Message-ID: 20120930194201.GA11319 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

If alloc_uprobe() fails uprobe_register() should return ENOMEM, not 0.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c |    4 +++-
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index a741ba7..3ec114c 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -813,7 +813,9 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
 	mutex_lock(uprobes_hash(inode));
 	uprobe = alloc_uprobe(inode, offset);
 
-	if (uprobe && !consumer_add(uprobe, uc)) {
+	if (!uprobe) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+	} else if (!consumer_add(uprobe, uc)) {
 		ret = __uprobe_register(uprobe);
 		if (ret) {
 			uprobe->consumers = NULL;
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]