[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] iommu/exynos: Use bus_set_iommu instead of register_iommu
From:       KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho () samsung ! com>
Date:       2011-09-30 23:52:45
Message-ID: CAHQjnOPiAOA_RiHnF-aVEYnWcdkwNzVD1BTNua+-ztZrW_+6_A () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Roedel, Joerg <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:31:49AM -0400, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> From: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
>>
>> This replaces register_iommu() with bus_set_iommu() according to the
>> suggestion of Joerg Roedel.
>
> This should be part of patch 3 already when the bus_set_iommu() change
> is merged. Otherwise it breaks bisectability too.
>
Ok.
Should I include fault handling feature (patch 4) in the patch 3 also?

Thanks.
KyongHo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]