[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    Re: Higher than expected disk write(2) latency
From:       Martin Sustrik <sustrik () fastmq ! com>
Date:       2008-06-30 22:20:16
Message-ID: 48695C20.6050704 () fastmq ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Roger,

>> Fair enough. That exaplains the behaviour. Would AIO help here? If we 
>> are able to enqueue next write before the first one is finished, it 
>> can start writing it immediately without waiting for a revolution.
> 
> If you could get them queued at the disk level, things that would need 
> to be watched were if the disk can queue things up (and all 
> controllers/drivers support it), and how many things the disk can queue 
> up, and how large each of those things can be, if they aren't queued at 
> the disk, there is the chance that the machine cannot get the data to 
> the disk faster enough for that next sector.

We'll try with AIO and we'll see what the impact would be.

> Depending on your application you could always get a small fast solid 
> state device (no seek or RPM issues), and use it to keep a journal that 
> could be replayed on an unexpected crash...and then just use various 
> syncs to force things to disk at various points.

Yes, that's one thing we want to do. However, we cannot assume that 
every user will have SSD, thus we should try to get the best latencies 
possible even on standard HD.

Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]