[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-kernel
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add force of use MMCONFIG [try #1]
From: Andi Kleen <ak () suse ! de>
Date: 2006-07-26 15:05:00
Message-ID: p73k6605rvn.fsf () verdi ! suse ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Why do we want to do this? Are the ACPI-provided tables incorrect? If so,
> > what problems are caused by this?
>
> The ACPI-provided tables are apparently correct, but we sanity-check them
> by _also_ requiring that the mmconfig base address is marked "reserved" in
> the e820 tables.
>
> The EFI memory maps apparently don't do that "reserved" marking.
We were planning to remove that heuristic anyways because it produced
far too many false positivies. In fact I think Greg has already
done it. Then that patch should be obsolete.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic