[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-kernel
Subject: Re: question on common error-handling idiom
From: Russell Miller <rmiller () duskglow ! com>
Date: 2004-11-02 21:12:28
Message-ID: 200411021512.29155.rmiller () duskglow ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 14:58, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> So to summarize, it's done to reduce code whilst keeping the error code
> around until we actually leave the function.
>
I understand what you're saying, the OP did raise a point that I think is
worth repeating, that it's an extra instruction in all but error cases. Is
that extra instruction worth the tradeoff?
--Russell
>
> My € 0.02!
>
>
> Jan Engelhardt
--
Russell Miller - rmiller@duskglow.com - Le Mars, IA
Duskglow Consulting - Helping companies just like you to succeed for ~ 10 yrs.
http://www.duskglow.com - 712-546-5886
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic