[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-kernel
Subject: Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P4
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell () joe-job ! com>
Date: 2004-08-20 10:33:49
Message-ID: 1092998028.10063.103.camel () krustophenia ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 06:27, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
>
> > This is an extreme load situation, so I don't think it will be a
> > real-world problem. I have not seen it under any normal workload.
>
> well, 9 msecs is still not nice. I've been able to trigger larger than
> 10msec latencies too on a 2 GHz box.
>
If this is the case then should a make -j12 have ground the machine
to a halt the way it did?
> hm, tcp_collapse() in net/ipv4/tcp_input.c. Could you try to just return
> from that function? Collapsing skbs of a given socket is not a
> necessary functionality (it is only a 'nice' thing to have in OOM
> situations) and it indeed can introduce quite high latencies.
>
OK, will test this.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic