On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:31:43PM +0200, Waldo Bastian wrote:
 >
 > The sentiment among filesystem developers seem to be that they don't 
care if
 > they trash files as long as the filesystem itself remains in a consistent
 > state. This kind of dataloss is the result of that attitude, either go
 > complain with them if it bothers you, or use a filesystem that does 
it right.
 >

Exactly.  Don't blame KDE.  Using XFS is equivalent to using 
non-battery-backed NVRAM on an external disk array.  Great if 
performance is _the_ metric and lost results can easily be regenerated 
(like in frame rendering).  By example, if you create a file, write to 
it, and then delete it fast enough, it will never hit the disk under XFS.


Roy Butler
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/