[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] Nick's scheduler policy v10
From:       "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh () aracnet ! com>
Date:       2003-08-31 20:41:38
[Download RAW message or body]

> Kernbench: (make -j vmlinux, maximal tasks)
>                               Elapsed      System        User         CPU
>               2.6.0-test4       45.87      116.92      571.10     1499.00
>        2.6.0-test4-nick10       46.91      114.03      584.16     1489.25

Actually, now looks like you have significantly more idle time, so perhaps
the cross-cpu (or cross-node) balancing isn't agressive enough:

      4583    10.0% default_idle
      2246     1.4% total
       377    12.0% zap_pte_range
       210    15.2% free_hot_cold_page
       161     9.3% buffered_rmqueue
       138    47.4% __set_page_dirty_buffers
       102     0.7% do_anonymous_page
        54     4.9% clear_page_tables
...
       -51    -4.3% file_move
       -63    -7.9% pte_alloc_one
       -63    -3.4% path_lookup
       -69   -18.5% .text.lock.file_table
       -70    -8.2% strnlen_user
       -76    -1.0% __d_lookup
       -96    -1.5% page_add_rmap
      -104   -16.8% copy_process
      -109    -2.9% find_get_page
      -118   -28.2% release_task
      -267   -18.8% schedule
      -357    -6.7% __copy_to_user_ll
      -531   -15.2% __copy_from_user_ll
      -809    -3.4% page_remove_rmap

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]