[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    RE: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
From:       "Folkert van Heusden" <folkert () vanheusden ! com>
Date:       2003-01-18 13:04:09
[Download RAW message or body]

> Am I wrong that the above would do the same thing without generating the
> sphagetti code that a goto would give you.  Gotos are BAD, very very
> bad.
TS> Whom do I pay to have this annoying clueless asshole shot?
TS> OH MY GOD, I really can't take any more.

Well well well, is that how we act these days if we see something we don't
like?

Anyway, I totally agree with Rob: if the code can be written without a goto
and produce the same efficient assembly (or better, see Robs change) it
should be written without it.
goto's are for lazy people
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]