[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
From:       Val Henson <val () nmt ! edu>
Date:       2003-01-13 22:02:00
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 04:27:30PM -0500, Rob Wilkens wrote:
> 
> I've only compiled (and haven't tested this code), but it should be much
> faster than the original code.  Why?  Because we're eliminating an extra
> "jump" in several places in the code every time open would be called. 
> Yes, it's more code, so the kernel is a little bigger, but it should be
> faster at the same time, and memory should be less of an issue nowadays.

To the tune of "Teen Angst" from Cracker:

  Cause, what the world needs now,
  is another theoretical optimizer
  like I need a hole in my head.

You'd think I'd be resigned to the l-k tradition of the unbenchmarked
"optimization" patch, but apparently not yet...

-VAL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]