[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-kernel
Subject: Re: The return of the return of crunch time (2.5 merge candidate list 1.6)
From: Pavel Machek <pavel () suse ! cz>
Date: 2002-01-15 17:44:28
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi!
> The point of my patchkit is to allow the file systems
> who support better resolution to handle it properly. Other filesystems
> are not worse than before when they flush inodes (and better off when
> they keep everything in ram for your build because then they will enjoy
> full time resolution)
What about always rounding down even when inode is
in memory? That is both simple and consistent.
> If you really wanted that I would recommend to change make.
> When all nanosecond parts are 0 it is reasonable for make to assume that
> the fs doesn't support finegrained resolution. But I'm not sure it's
> worth it.
Thats really ugly heuristics. What about filling
nanosecond part with ~0 when unavailable?
Psvel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic