[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    Re: CONFIG_TINY
From:       Tom Rini <trini () kernel ! crashing ! org>
Date:       2002-11-05 19:56:16
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:26:08PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Tom Rini wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 02:13:48AM +0000, Rob Landley wrote:
> 
> > > I've used -Os.  I've compiled dozens and dozens of packages with -Os.  It has 
> > > always saved at least a few bytes, I have yet to see it make something 
> > > larger.  And in the benchmarks I've done, the smaller code actually runs 
> > > slightly faster.  More of it fits in cache, you know.
> > 
> > Then we don't we always use -Os?
>
[snip 6 good reasons]

So why do we want to force it on for CONFIG_TINY?

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]